Bonnie and Clyde: An American crime/love story4

An awesome finish to the semester! Bonnie and Clyde, starring (and produced by) Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway, is a semi accurate film based on the real infamous couple of the Barrow gang in the 1930’s. This film returns back to our early semester’s study of the gangster era. The cinematography and style is highly influenced by the French new wave with it’s jump cuts and changeable tone techniques. Even though the film was shot in the 1966, I thought it was really believable to the 1930’s time frame because of it’s realistic setting and stylistc gangster costumes. One of the most memorable scenes to me (besides the ending) was when Bonnie and Clyde kidnap an undertaker named Eugene and his girlfriend. It was such a comical scene mostly due to Gene Wilder’s performance, which also happened to be his film debut. This scene depicts the Barrow’s gangs’ lifestyle viewed from an outsider’s perspective. The scene was also acurately depicted except for the result of Eugene’s release, which happened once Bonnie found out Eugene’s profession. In reality Bonnie only Commented that Eugene “might work on her one day,” which frightingly becomes true. Bonnie and Clyde are the most memorable duo in both crime history as well as cinema history. I truly feel that Bonnie and Clyde is one of the best films of all time!


Analysis #2 Formal Analysis: Meshes of the Afternoon (1943)27

The Materiality of Film

Maya Deren’s short film examplifies the “Materiality” of film which breaks all of the rules of filmaking. Meshes of the Afternoon is a film that gratifies towards the subconscious level as it is presented as a mysterious, suspenseful dream within a dream. Since the opening shot of the film, the viewer can sense the dreamlike theme of the film. The first shot is a MCU of an artificial like arm placing a flower on the ground, then suddenly dissappears from view. This stop action shot is used often throughout this film, already giving an illusionary feel. The next shot shows a women walking in frame through shadow as we see  her take the flower. A CU shot of her hand picking up the flower automatically draws the viewers attention to the flower. A WS as she sees someone turning a corner who we can’t make out since the person is hidden in shadow. The CU shot of her hands trying to retrieve her key but drops it down the stairs has a dramatic effect as the rhythm of the music matches as a diegetic sound of the key hitting each stair.

Once the women enters her home we see through her POV shot scanning the living room but then jump cuts to the dining room table. The camera zooms in on the bread and knife then jump cuts again to a CU of the knife falling down on the table, then pans to a telephone that is off the hook on a stairway. As the women goes up the stairs, we see a POV shot of her looking in her bedroom, then jump cuts to her stopping a phonograph after the music stops almost seeming as if the score is diegetic. As she goes back downstairs to sit on the chair, the camera followes as a POV shot moving steadily towards the arm chair. When she sits down, the shot is a high angle which only shows from her kness up to her chest, cutting off her head as  she places the flower on her lap.  An ECU shot of her eye shutting is parallel to the WS of the outside view as it slowly darkens making it a POV shot. These shots places the viewer in a state of tranquility as the darkening of the shot and silence of sounds progresses into a dream state of consciousness.

A low humming sound abrubtly ends the silence in the next shot of the outside view, which the camera zooms out of a tunnel to reveal a dark hooded figure. A MCU shot of the hooded figure turns to the camera reavealing a mirror as a face holding the flower. The music in this scene abrubtly stops and re starts creating an eerie atmosphere. The women is shown trying to catch up to the figure through shadow and close ups of her feet running, but not showing her face. As she re enters her home through the door, the same POV shot is shown of her scanning the house, which jumpcuts to a CU of a knife on the stairway. She ascends up the stairs passing the knife in a close up shot of her feet in slow motion which examplifies a dream like quality of the scene. The women even slowely and dramatically enters through her bedroom curtains also dreamlike. When she scans her bedroom in a MCU shot, her facial expression is kinda frightened and cautious. When she finds the phone on her pillow, we view it as a POV shot as she pulls the cover to reveal a knife. The music humming starts up again setting the mood to suspense. A CU shot of her reflection on the phone also gives off an eerie vibe as her face in the reflection is somewhat distorted.

The next shot of her is MCU of her falling out her window, then cuts back to her falling against the stair railing at an odd angle. The scene cuts to many other odd angles of her hanging on to the railing as the camera shifts and turns following her movement on the railing. The camera then cuts to a low angle shot as she gravitates toward the ceiling while the music speedens up. The POV high angle shots of her looking down at herself and stopping the phonograph also gives off a dream setting. She views at herself numerously from her resting on the chair to viewing herself outside as she chases the hooded figure multiple times. A CU shot of her removing a key from her mouth is also repeated througout the film, which not only gives off a dream like quality but also alertness to the subject of the key. When she re enters her home in the next shot, we see her POV on the hooded figure walking up the stairs which the camera followes as well as her in the shot. As she ascends up the stairs, she is viewed at a high angle crawling up the stairs with difficulty as she is thrust towards the wall along with the camera following her. The camera shifts again as she slowly turns to the right away from the camera, then shifts again as she reaches the top of the staircase from below the camera viewpoint. The MCU of the hooded figure placing the flower on her bed as he slowly turns towards the camera is visualy unsettling when the humming starts up again, but is then confusing when it abrubtly dissappears in a stop action shot. This sequence is followed by numerous still shots of the women in the staircase appearing forward and backward creating another illusionary quality.

In a CU shot of her looking out at herself on the couch then towards the window, she views repetitive shots of herself chasing the hooded figure while (also repetitively) removes a key from her mouth. However, in the CU shot of the key on her palm, it cuts to a knife instead of a key. She re enters her home with a knife, then cuts back to the diner table which shows two versions of herself looking back impressively in the same shot. When she places the knife on the table in front of her twin selves, there is a stop action on the knife as it reappears as a key, and they continue to questioningly stare at her. These double versions of her, similar to a doppelganger, gives off an uneasiness danger vibe. As repetitive shots of each twin taking the key proceeds, there is a MCU of each women softly imitating the same hand gestures that the initial women previously done before she falls asleep. Once the initial women takes the key, a CU shot of the key reappears  as a knife, cuts back to CU of the womens’s shock expression then cuts to her sleeping body on the arm chair. The next shot of her is an odd turnaround since she is wearing mysterious goggles and advances to herself with a knife. Each shots proceeds with CU of her feet walking on sand near the ocean repetively, examplifying a difference in time and space.

After the knife lowers on her unconcious body, it cuts to a ECU of her eyes opening, then a CU of a man emerging in front of her. He lifts her up, and she slowly followes him as he ascends the stairs, a MS where he places the phone back on hook and carries the same flower with him. At this point as she followes him up the stairway, all shots are repetively similar to her dream sequence when she followed the hooded figure. A MS of her looking through her bedroom doorway entails that she is cautionary. A MCU shot of the man’s face appears as his reflection on the bedside mirror leads viewers to believe that he is the dark hooded figure in her dream. The shot of his reflection is half covered in darkness giving the impression of impending danger beneath the surface as he puts the mirror away. The music also gives off a suspenseful atmosphere as the humming sound speeds up almost imitating a heart pounding. We see a CU shot of the knife reappearing again on her pillow after she lies down which she throws towards the man. The shot cuts to the knife breaking the man’s reflection revealing a beach scenery behind it, signifying that this may be another dream. The film ends with the man entering his home with a flower to find shattered glass on the floor beside his dead wife.


Deren’s film clearly demonstrates a dreamscape atmosphere through over use of stop action cutting and abrubt editing. The abstract camera angles and movements generates a dream like quality that allowes audiences to question and wonder into a subconscious level. With all of the abstract editing and symbolic imagery, it’s evident to believe that Deren and husband Hammid wanted to show an artistic visual of the subconscious through film. Viewers that watch the film are lead to follow a normal narrative, but gets fooled once the first shot is displayed. There are many subjective shots that parallels with camera angles and movements. These technical shots are obvious to the viewer,while also subtle to clues and symbolism leaving an open ending. Deren’s objective for this film was to create a poetic visual art film, initially an avant garde personal film with her husband. However not only does this film carries out as an avant garde, but also is considered one of the most influential and powerful experimental films ever made.



Extra Credit: Lolita (1962)5



Stanly Kubrick’s 1962 film Lolita is about a middle aged professor’s sexual infatuation over a 14 year old girl based on Vladimir Nabokov’s controversial novel. Kubrick’s film itself was also controversial due to the novel’s serious content of pedophilia. James Mason stars as the protagonist Humbert Humbert, and Sue Nylon stars as Lolita. In this clip that I posted, Humbert arrives at the house of Charlotte Haze looking for a room to rent. Here he meets Charlotte’s young adolescent daughter, Dolores, aka ‘Lolita.’

The clip starts off with Charlotte Haze giving Humbert a tour of the place. She shows Humbert her art paintings, then questions him about his marital status. They are viewed in a MS as Charlotte continues to flirtatiously converse with him about Paris. Humbert is a bit akward as he subtlety leans away and bemused when he learns about her husband. Charlotte continues to flirt with him which Humbert backens away, obviously showing viewers his disinterest in Charlotte. As he backs away, the shot cuts to him bumping into a portrait where Charlotte excuses herself and mentions how she previously commanded her daughter to put it away. She continues to tour him around when Humbert abrubtly asks her for her phone number so he could think about it. After she gives him her number, she insistently takes him to view her garde, which cuts to a MS of Lolita sunbathing on her lawn. CU shot of Humbert’s face as he gazes at Lolita with a fascinated expression. MS back to Lolita lowering the music playing on the radio, then slowly stares back at him. Humbert accepts Charlotte’s offer for $200 a month and eagerly asks Charlotte when he is to move in. The clip ends with Charlotte asking him what was the decisive factor of his wanting to move in, which Humbert replies “for her cherry pies.”

The clip demonstrates how slightly abnormal and disturbed Humbert is as a character. His appearence seems to look normal since his profession is an educator making him appear respected.  However once he discovers Lolita, it’s clear that his normality given in the begining of this clip slims due to his abnormal infatuation over Lolita. Charlotte Hazes is viewed as an assertive womon which can translate both as an over bearing mother and sexualy assertive widow. Lolita’s introductory scene demonstrates how unattached she is to the world around her. She is viewed as a sexual object by Humbert and an imposing threat to her mother. This clip visually shows her distance between them.

This film was set in the 1950’s but shot in the early 60’s. It was produced by MGM studios, but filmed in Londen due to financial reasons. The film contained lots of cuts from the book in order to achieve a reasonable MPAA  rating. Even Lolita’s age was altered to 14 instead of 12 which was her original age in the book in order to appear less suggestive toward pedophilia.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet

Skip to toolbar